Abramo, G., Cicero, T., D’Angelo, C. A. (2011), Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length, Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 659-667.

Abramo, G., Cicero, T., D’Angelo, C. A. (2011), The dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems, Scientometrics, 87: 641-654.

Abramo, G., Cicero, T., D’Angelo, C. A. (2013), National peer-review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money: The Italian case, Scientometrics, 95 (1), 311-324.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A. (2011), Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics, Scientometrics, 87(3), 499-514.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A. (2015), The VQR, Italy’s second national research assessment: Methodological failures and ranking distortions, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2202-2214.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A. (2016), Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011-2014), Scientometrics, 109(3), 2053-2065.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. (2017), On tit for tat: Franceschini and Maisano versus ANVUR regarding the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014, Journal of Informetrics, 11 (3), 783-87.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A. (2020), A bibliometric methodology to unveil territorial inequities in the scientific wealth to combat COVID-19, ArXiv abs/2011.08278.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F. (2010), Citations versus Journal Impact Factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable? Scientometrics, 84: 821–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0200-1

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F. (2011), Research productivity: are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?, Scientometrics, 88(3), 915-928.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A.,   Di Costa, F. (2011), National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings, Scientometrics, 89(3), 929-941.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F. (2014), Inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises, Scientometrics, 98(3), 2069-2086.

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Caprasecca, A. (2009), Allocative efficiency in public research funding: can bibliometrics help?, Research Policy, 38(1), 206-215

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Rosati, F. (2014), Career advancement and scientific performance in universities, Scientometrics, 98(3), 891–907.

Abramo, G.,   D’Angelo, C.A., Solazzi,   M.   (2010), National   research   assessment exercises: a measure of the distortion of performance rankings when labor input is treated as uniform, Scientometrics, 84(3), 605-619.

Alfò M., Benedetto S., Malgarini M., Sarlo S. (2017), On the use of Bibliometric information for assessing articles quality: an analysis based on the third Italian evaluation exercise, STI Conference 2017, Paris: https://sti2017.paris/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/rp-m-alfo-et-al.pdf

Ancaiani, A., Anfossi, A. F., Barbara, A., Benedetto, S., Blasi, B., Carletti, V., Cicero, T., Ciol, A., Costa, F., Colizza, G., Costantini, M., di Cristina, F., Ferrara, A., Lacatena, R. M., Malgarini, M., Mazzotta, I., Nappi, C. A., Romagnosi, S., Sileoni, S. (2015), Evaluating scientific research in Italy: The 2004-10 research evaluation exercise, Research Evaluation, 24, 242–255. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv008

Anfossi, A., Ciolfi, A., Costa, F., Parisi, G., Benedetto, S. (2016), Large-scale assessment of research outputs through a weighted combination of bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 107(2), 671-683.

Anzera, G., Fasanella, A., Liani, S., Martire, F., Palmieri, M. (2016), L’auto-valutazione della produzione di una comunità scientifica: una proposta metodologica, RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione, 64:112:131.

Aru, S., Celata, F., Rondinone, A., Rossi, U., Santini, C. (2010), L’Università che cambia, la valutazione della ricerca, il ruolo delle riviste scientifiche, Rivista Geografica Italiana, 117, 195-216.

Aversano, N., Rossi, F. M., Tartaglia Polcini, P. (2017), I sistemi di misurazione della performance nelle università: considerazioni critiche sul sistema italiano, Management Control, 1:15-36.

Baccini A. (2010), Valutare la ricerca scientifica. Uso e abuso degli indicatori bibliometrici, Milano, Il Mulino.

Baccini, A. (2013), Come e perché ridisegnare la valutazione, Il Mulino, 2013(1): 80-87.

Baccini A. (2014), Le donne sono state discriminate nell’abilitazione scientifica nazionale?, in Roars, Return On Academic Research:, https://www.roars.it/online/le-donne-sono-state-discriminate-nellabilitazione-scientifica-nazionale/

Baccini A. (2016), Collaborazionisti o resistenti. L’accademia ai tempi della valutazione della ricerca, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/collaborazionisti-o-resistenti-laccademia-aitempi-della-valutazione-della-ricerca/

Baccini, A. (2016), Reader comment to Bonaccorsi et al. (2015). F1000Res, 4: 196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6478.1

Baccini, A. (2016), Napoléon et l’évaluation bibliométrique de la recherche. Considérations sur la réforme de l’université et sur l’action de l’agence national d’évaluation en Italie – Napoleon and the bibliometric evaluation of research: Considerations on university reform and the action of the national evaluation agency in Italy, Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science-Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Information et de Bibliotheconomie, 40 (1), 37-57.

Baccini A., Barabesi L., Cioni M., Pisani C. (2014), Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance, Scientometrics, 101, 3: 2035–2062.

Baccini A., Coin F., Sirilli G. (2013), Costi e benefici della valutazione della ricerca e della didattica, Paradoxa Forum,VII, 2: 49.

Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G. (2016), Academics in Italy have boycotted assessment. What has it achieved, Times Higher Education, 21.

Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G. (2016), Do they agree? bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise, Scientometrics, 108(3), 1651–1671.

Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G. (2016), Reply to the comment of Bertocchi et al., Scientometrics, 108 (3): 1675-84. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2055-6

Baccini, A., De Nicolao G. (2017), Peer review e bibliometria non concordano. Neanche in Italia, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/peer-review-e-bibliometria-non-concordano-neanche-in-italia/

Baccini, A., De Nicolao G. (2017), VQR: le classifiche prêt-à-porter confezionate dai GEV. And the winners are   …, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/vqr-le-classifiche-pret-a-porter-confezionate-dai-gev-and-the-winners-are

Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G. (2017), A letter on Ancaiani et al.‘Evaluating scientific research in Italy: the 2004-10 research evaluation exercise, Research Evaluation, 26(4), 353-357. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvx013

Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G. (2017), Errors and secret data in the Italian research assessment exercise. A comment to a reply, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06822.

Baccini A., De Nicolao G., Petrovich E. (2019), Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: a country-level comparative analysis, PLoS One, 14, n.9 < https://bit.ly/2PKrF84 >

Baccini A., Rosselli A. (2014), Abilitazione scientifica nazionale, miglioramenti da migliorare, In genere, http://www.ingenere.it/articoli/abilitazione-scientifica-nazionale-miglioramenti-da-migliorare

Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M., Zinovyeva, N. (2017). Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? American Economic Review, 107(4), 1207–1238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151211

Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M., Zinovyeva, N. (2019). Connections in scientific committees and applicants’ self-selection: Evidence from a natural randomized experiment. Labour Economics, 58: 81–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.04.005

Barbanera, L., Floridi, F., Fusillo, F. (2017), Per i Big Data nella ricerca valutativa: una proposta operativa per la gestione del matching prodotto-revisore nella VQR, Rassegna Italiana di valutazione, 68: 103-119.

Benedetto, S., Bertoni, C., Poggi, G., Breno, E., Paganelli, N., Lacatena, R., Carletti, V. (2015), L’utilizzo dei dati VQR per la valutazione dipartimentale negli atenei italiani – Metodologie ed esperienze, Roma, Fondazione CRUI. https://www.crui.it/images/demo/crui_web/pubblicazioni/vqr_testodefnew.pdf

Benedetto S., Cicero T., Malgarini M. (2014), Research quality, characteristics of publications and socio-demographic characteristics of Universities and Researchers: evidence from the Italian VQR 2004-2010 Evaluation exercise, Proceedings of the science and technology indicators conference. Context Counts: Pathways to Master Big and Little Data, Leiden.

Benedetto, S., Cicero, T., Malgarini, M. (2016), Determinants of research quality in Italian universities: Evidence from the 2004 to 2010 evaluation exercise, Research Evaluation, 25, 3: 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw017

Benedetto, S., Checchi, D., Graziosi, A., Malgarini, M. (2017), Comments on the paper “Critical remarks on the Italian assessment exercise” Journal of Informetrics, 11 (2017): 337–357, Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 622-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.03.005

Benedetto S., Checchi D., Graziosi A., Malgarini M. (2017), Comments on the correspondence “On tit for tat: Franceschini and Maisano versus ANVUR regarding the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014”, J. Informetr., 11 (2017), 783-787, Journal of Informetrics, 11/3, pp. 838-840.

Benedetto, S., Cicero, T., Malgarini, M., Nappi, C. (2017). Reply to the letter on Ancaiani et al.‘Evaluating Scientific research in Italy: The 2004–10 research evaluation exercise’, Research Evaluation, 26(4), 358-360. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvx017

Bertocchi, G., Gambardella, A., Jappelli, T., Nappi, C. A., Peracchi, F. (2015), Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy, Research Policy, 44 (2): 451-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.004

Bertocchi, G., Gambardella, A., Jappelli, T., Nappi, C.A., Peracchi, F. ( (2016), Comment to: Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise, Scientometrics, 108, 349–353.

Bertoli-Barsotti, L. (2017), Le incongruenze dell’ISPD e i dipartimenti di eccellenza, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/le-incongruenze-dellispd-e-i-dipartimenti-di-eccellenza/

Bianco, M.L. (2014), Come spiegare la pessima performance della sociologia alla VQR e alla ASN, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/come-spiegare-la-pessima-performance-della-sociologia-alla-vqr-e-alla-asn/

Bianco, M.L., Giovannini, P., Marradi, A., Rositi, F., Sciolla, L., Sgritta, G.B. (2014), Dove va la sociologia? (Riflessioni amare sui risultati dell’ASN), Per la Sociologia: http://perlasociologia.blogspot.com/2014/01/dove-va-la-sociologia-riflessioni-amare.html

Biesenbender, S. (2019), The governance and standardisation of research information in different science systems: A comparative analysis of Germany and Italy, Higher Education Quarterly, 73(1), 116-127.

Biolcati-Rinaldi F., Molteni F., Salini S. (2018), Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Google Scholar Indicators. The Case of Social Sciences in Italy, in Bonaccorsi A. (a cura di), The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, Cham, Springer: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68554-0_13

Blasi, B. (2015), Severità di giudizio: dinamiche valutative nell’area della sociologia nella VQR 2004-2010, Sociologia e Politiche Sociali. 2015, Vol. 18 Issue 2: 9-43. DOI: 10.3280/SP2015-002002

Blasi, B., Romagnosi, S., Bonaccorsi, A. (2017), Playing the ranking game: media coverage of the evaluation of the quality of research in Italy, Higher Education, 73, 741–757.

Blasi, B., Romagnosi, S., Bonaccorsi, A. (2018), Universities as celebrities? How the media select information from a large Research Assessment Exercise, Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 503–514.

Blasi, B., Romagnosi, S., Bonaccorsi, A. (2018), Do SSH researchers have a third mission (and should they have)?, in Bonaccorsi A. (a cura di), The evaluation of research in Social Sciences and Humanities. Lessons from the Italian experience, Dordrecht, Springer: 361–392. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68554-0_16

Bonaccorsi A. (2012), Potenzialità e limiti della analisi bibliometrica nelle aree umanistiche e sociali. Verso un programma di lavoro, www.anvur.it

Bonaccorsi, A. (2018, a cura di), The evaluation of research in social sciences and humanities, Cham, Springer.

Bonaccorsi, A. (2020),Two Decades of Experience in Research Assessment in Italy, Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2(1):16. DOI: http://doi.org/10.29024/sar.27

Bonaccorsi, A. (2020), Two Decades of Research Assessment in Italy. Addressing the Criticisms. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2(1):17. DOI: http://doi.org/10.29024/sar.28

Bonaccorsi A., Cicero T. (2015), Distributed or concentrated research excellence? Evidence form a large scale research assessment exercise, JASIST, 67/12, pp. 2976-2992: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.23539

Bonaccorsi A., Cicero T. (2016), Non-deterministic ranking of departments and universities, Journal of Informetrics, 10/1, 224-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.00

Bonaccorsi, A., Cicero, T., Ferrara, A., Malgarini, M. (2015), Journal ratings as predictors of articles quality in Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences: an analysis based on the Italian Research Evaluation Exercise, F1000Res , 4: 196: https://f1000research.com/articles/4-196

Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., Fantoni, S., Folli, V., Leonetti, M., Ruocco, G.(2017), Do social sciences and humanities behave like life and hard sciences?, Scientometrics 112, 607–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2384-0

Bonaccorsi, A., Ferrara, A., Malgarini, M. (2018), Journal ratings as predictors of article quality in Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences: An analysis based on the Italian research evaluation exercise, in Bonaccorsi, A. (a cura di), The evaluation of research in social sciences and humanities, Cham, Springer: 253-267.

Borrelli D., Stazio M (2015), «La supercazzola prematurata delle riviste di classe A con scappellamento Anvur a destra, ovvero: come confezionare una svolta autoritaria nascondendola dietro al ridicolo di un roboante linguaggio tecnoburocratico», Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/la-supercazzola-prematurata-delle-riviste-di-classe-a-con-scappellamento-anvur-a-destra-ovvero-come-confezionare-una-svolta-autoritaria-nascondendola-dietro-al-ridicolo-di-un-roboante-linguaggio-t/

Borrelli D., Stazio M. (2015) Paradossi in fascia A. Quer pasticciaccio brutto della terza mediana, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/paradossi-in-fascia-a-ovvero-quer-pasticciaccio-brutto-della-terza-mediana/

Campelli E. (2011), A proposito di riviste. Valutazione e aritmetica, «protezionismo» e «liberismo», Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, 32, 95: 5-12.

Canino, M. (2018), La certificazione di qualità dell‘istruzione universitaria dopo le nuove indicazioni ministeriali, Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 1,DOI: https://doi.org/10.32049/RTSA.2019.1.2

Carinci, F., Brollo, M. (2013). La legge n. 240/2010 alla prova dei fatti: le procedure di valutazione , in Carinci, F., Brollo, M. (a cura di), Abilitazione scientifica per i professori universitari, Milano, Wolters Kluwer Italia: 1-14

Caso, R. (2017), Alle origini dell’ISPD: magie statistiche, opzioni politiche e orrori giuridici, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/alle-origini-dellispd-magie-statistiche-opzioni-politiche-e-orrori-giuridici/

Cassese S. (2013), L’Anvur ha ucciso la valutazione, viva la valutazione!, il Mulino, n.1: 73-79

Checchi D., Mazzotta I., Momigliano S. (2017), Research assessment in Italy: have the results of universities converged?, STI Conference 2017, Paris: https://sti2017.paris/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/uni-checchi-et-al.pdf

Checchi D., Ciolfi A., DeFraja G., Mazzotta I., Verzillo S (2018), Have you read this? Replacing the British REF peer review evaluation with the Italian VQR bibliometric algorithm: An empirical analysis, Nottingham School of Economics, DP N. 329.

Cicero, T., Malgarini, M., Nappi, C. A.,   Peracchi, F. (2013), Bibliometric and peer review methods for research evaluation: a methodological appraisement, MPRA (Munich Personal REPEc Archive), Munich.

Cicero T., Malgarini M. (2017), The effect of research collaboration on citation impact: a dynamic panel data analysis?, STI Conference 2017, Paris. https://sti2017.paris/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/is2-cicero-on-collaborations.pdf

Cicero, T., Malgarini, M. (2020), On the use of journal classification in social sciences and humanities: evidence from an Italian database, Scientometrics, 125(2), 1689-1708.

Cicero, T., Malgarini, M., Nappi, C.A., Peracchi, F. (2013), Bibliometric and peer review methods for research evaluation: a methodological appraisement, MPRA (Munich Personal REPEc Archive), (50470)

Cipriani R. (2013), È scoppiata la valutazione. Una proposta: il criterio della «non prevalenza», Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 100: 11-16.

Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., Zacchia, G. (2018), A case study of pluralism in Economics. The heterodox glass ceiling in Italy, Review of Political Economy, 30(2): 172–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2018.1423974

Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., Zacchia, G. (2019), Diversity of background and ideas. The case of research evaluation in economics, Research Policy, 48, 103820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103820

De Nicolao G. (2014), Vqr da Buttare? Persino Anvur cestina i voti usati per l’assegnazione FFO 2013, in Roars (2015), Università 3.0. Quattro anni vissuti pericolosamente, Roma, ManifestoLibri

De Nicolao G. (2016), Do you believe in magic? L’ANVUR tra pseudoscienza e intimidazione matematica, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/do-you-believe-in-magic-la-vqr-tra-pseudoscienza-e-intimidazione-matematica/

De Nicolao G. (2017), La “junk arithmetic” della bibliometria fai-da-te della VQR 2011-2014, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/la-junk-arithmetic-della-bibliometria-fai-da-te-della-vqr-2011-2014/

De Nicolao, G. (2017), Volete scalare la classifica dei Dipartimenti eccellenti? Il trucco sta in un parallelogramma, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/volete-scalare-la-classifica-dei-dipartimenti-eccellenti-il-trucco-sta-in-un-parallelogramma/

De Paola, M., Scoppa, V. (2015), Gender discrimination and evaluators’ gender: Evidence from Italian academia, Economica, 82: 162–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12107

De Santis Puzzonia M., Beltram F., Cicero T., Malgarini M. (2018), Accounting for co-autorship in research evaluation: the case of experimental physics, 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology indicators, Leiden: 967-974: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/65214/STI2018_paper_164.pdf?sequence=1

Decataldo, A. (2018), Valutare la didattica universitaria: considerazioni sui principi ispiratori e sui processi, Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 1,DOI: https://doi.org/10.32049/RTSA.2019.1.3

Demetrescu, C., Finocchi, I., Ribichini, A., Schaerf, M. (2020), On bibliometrics in academic promotions: a case study in computer science and engineering in Italy, Scientometrics, 124(3), 2207-2228.

Demetrescu, C., Lupia, F., Mendicelli, A., Ribichini, A., Scarcello, F., Schaerf, M. (2019), On the Shapley value and its application to the Italian VQR research assessment exercise, Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 87-104.

Demetrescu, C., Ribichini, A., Schaerf, M. (2020), Are Italian research assessment exercises size-biased?, Scientometrics, 125(1), 533-549.

Demetrescu, C., Ribichini, A., Schaerf, M. (2020), Are Italian research assessment exercises size-biased?, Scientometrics 125, 533–549.

Di Benedetto, A. (2015), Un’analisi del concetto di qualità della ricerca nella Vqr, Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 108: 95-112.

Eslami, Z., Hakimzadeh, R., Saboury, A. A. (2018), Comparative Study of Explanation the Framework for Assessment he Quality of Research in Iran’s Higher Education System with the Countries of Britain, Australia, the Netherlands, Italy and Hong Kong, jiera, 12(42), 59-76.

Faggiolani, C., Solimine, G. (2018), Mapping the role of the book in evaluation at the individual and department level in Italian SSH. A multisource analysis, in Bonaccorsi, A. (a cura di), The evaluation of research in social sciences and humanities, Cham, Springer: 33-53.

Fantoni S. (2015), Il Sistema di valutazione Anvur, Scuola Democratica, 3: 695- 703.

Fantoni S., Ancaiani A. (2014), La Valutazione dei prodotti della ricerca ed il suo impatto sul sistema universitario e degli enti di ricerca: il caso italiano, Mèlanges de la casa de Velazquez, 44, pp. 313-18.

Fasanella A., Di Benedetto A. (2014), “Luci e ombre nella Vqr 2004-2010. Un focus sulla scheda di valutazione peer nell’Area 14”, Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, 104: 59-84.

Fasanella A., Di Benedetto A. (2015), “La valutazione dei pari nelle scienze sociali e politiche. La lezione della Vqr 2004-2010”, Sociologia e Politiche Sociali, 18, 2: 44-72.

Fasanella A., Martire F. (2017), Considerazioni metodologiche sulla VQR 2011-2014 e possibili sviluppi della valutazione, Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 114, pp. 89-116.

Ferrara, A., Bonaccorsi, A. (2016), How robust is journal rating in Humanities and Social Sciences? Evidence from a large-scale, multi-method exercise, Research Evaluation, 25, 3: 279- 291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv048

Franceschet, M., Costantini, A. (2011), The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective, Journal of Informetrics, 5 (2): 275–291.

Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. (2017), Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014, Journal of Informetrics, 11(2): 337–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.005

Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. (2017), A rejonder to the comments of Benedetto et al. on the paper “Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014” (Journal of Informetrics 11(2), 337–357), Journal of Informetrics, 11: 645–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.013

Franco, G. (2013), Il settore scientifico-disciplinare MED44 di fronte all’esercizio di valutazione della qualità della ricerca (VQR 2004-2010) dell’ANVUR: luci e ombre, La Medicina Del Lavoro, 104(6), 483-485.

Freschi, A.C. (2014), 14/C1. Colpito e affondato!, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/14c1-colpito-e-affondato/

Frondizi, R., Fantauzzi, C., Colasanti, N., Fiorani, G. (2019), The evaluation of universities’ third mission and intellectual capital: theoretical analysis and application to Italy, Sustainability, 11(12), 3455.

Galderisi, C., Perretti, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Leeuwen, T. (2019), Report of the Group of experts charged by ANVUR to advice on the process “Valutazione della qualità della ricerca (VQR)”, Roma, ANVUR. http://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/High-Experts-Report-on-VQR.pdf

Geuna, A., Piolatto, M. (2016), Research assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and difficult, but probably worth it (at least for a while), Research Policy, 45(1), 260-271.

Giannetti, F., Chirici, G., Paoletti, E., Borghetti, M., Corona, P., Bucci, G. (2016), Assessing the bibliometric productivity of forest scientists in Italy, Annals of Silvicultural Research, 40(1), 19-30.

Greco, P. (2014), Le vie tortuose dell’abilitazione scientifica nazionale, Scienza in rete: https://www.scienzainrete.it/contenuto/articolo/pietro-greco/le-vie-tortuose-dellabilitazione-scientifica-nazionale/febbraio-2014

Greco, G., Lupia, F., Scarcello, F. (2016), Towards a Fair VQR with the Aid of Database (and Game) Theory, SEBD: 254-261.

Greco, G., Scarcello, F. (2013), Fair division rules for funds distribution: The case of the Italian Research Assessment Program (VQR 2004–2010), Intelligenza Artificiale, 7(1), 45-56.

Guida, G. (2018), An Analysis of Scientific Research Performance in Italy: Evaluation Criteria and Public Funding, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(7), 1-45.

Ialacqua G. (2018), Dipartimenti Fantastici e dove trovarli, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/dipartimenti-fantastici-e-dove-trovarli/

Lupia, F., Mendicelli, A., Ribichini, A., Scarcello, F., Schaerf, M. (2018), Computing the Shapley value in allocation problems: approximations and bounds, with an application to the Italian VQR research assessment program, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 30(4), 505-524.

Malgarini M., Nappi C.A., Torrini R. (2015), Article and Journal level metrics in massive research evaluation exercises: the Italian case, in Salah A.A., Tonta Y., Akdag Salah A.A., Sugimoto C., Al U. (a cura di.), Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Bogaziçi University Printhouse, Istanbul.

Marcuzzo M. C., G. Zacchia (2007), L’Econlit e gli strumenti per la valutazione della ricerca economica in Italia, Rivista Italiana degli Economisti, 12: 279-310.

Martire, F., Fasanella, A. (2017), Considerazioni metodologiche sulla Vqr 2011-2014 e possibili sviluppi della valutazione, Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 114, 3: 89-116.

Marzolla, M. (2015), Quantitative analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification, Journal of Informetrics, 9, 2: 285–316.

Marzolla, M. (2016), Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: the case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification, Journal of Informetrics, 10(2): 408-438. DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.009

Minelli E., Rebora G., Turri M. (2008), The Structure and Significance of the Italian Research Assessment Exercise (VTR), in Mazza C., Quattrone P. and Riccaboni A. (a cura di), European Universities in Transition. Issues, Models and Cases. Cheltenham (UK), Edward Elgar.

Nascia, L., Pianta, M. (2015), RIO country report, Italy 2014, JRC Science and Policy Report.

Palumbo M., Pennisi C. (2014), La valutazione senza governo, RIV. Rassegna italiana di valutazione, 59:7-33.

Palumbo, R. (a cura di, 2012), La valutazione periodica della ricerca nelle discipline economico-aziendali: una comparazione internazionale, Milano, Franco Angeli.

Peruginelli, G. (2019), Evaluation of academic legal publications in Italy. In Evaluating Academic Legal Research in Europe, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Peruginelli, G., Faro, S., Agnoloni, T. (2018), A survey on legal research monograph evaluation in Italy, in Bonaccorsi, A. (a cura di), The evaluation of research in social sciences and humanities, Cham, Springer: 211-230.

Petersohn, S., Biesenbender, S., & Thiedig, C. (2020), Investigating Assessment Standards in the Netherlands, Italy, and the United Kingdom: Challenges for Responsible Research Evaluation, Shaping the Future Through Standardization, IGI Global: pp. 54-94.

Potì, B., Reale, E. (2012), ERAWATCH Country Reports 2011: Italy (No. JRC77750), Joint Research Centre (Seville site).

Poggi, F., Ciancarini, P., Gangemi, A., Nuzzolese, A. G., Peroni, S., Presutti, V. (2019), Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics, Peer J Computer Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.199

Poggi, G., Nappi, C. A. (2014), Il Voto standardizzato per l’esercizio VQR 2004–2010, RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione, 59, 34–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/RIV2014-059003

Rebora G. (2013), Nessuno mi può giudicare: l’università e la valutazione, Guerini, Milano.

Rebora, G., Turri, M. (2013), The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face, Research policy, 42(9), 1657-1666.

Redazione Roars (2017), Bibliometria anvuriana: se la conosci la eviti, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/bibliometria-anvuriana-se-la-conosci-la-eviti/

Redazione Roars (2017), La valutazione della ricerca ha un costo molto elevato. Le metodologie di stima sono discutibili, ma la sostanza non cambia, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/re-post-la-valutazione-della-ricerca-ha-un-costo-molto-elevato-le-metodologie-di-stima-sono-discutibili-ma-la-sostanza-non-cambia/

Redazione Roars (2017), La VQR? Uno spreco. Il premio vale 58 MLN, la gara ne costa almeno 30, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/la-vqr-uno-spreco-il-premio-vale-58-mln-la-gara-ne-costa-almeno-30/

Redazione Roars (2018), Dipartimenti di eccellenza: Anvur secreta i calcoli. Cantone, se ci sei, batti un colpo, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/dipartimenti-di-eccellenza-anvur-secreta-i-calcoli-cantone-se-ci-sei-batti-un-colpo/

Ribolzi L. (2013), Valutare l’università: una sfida non solo per l’Anvur, Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 100:23-32.

Rolfo, S., Finardi, U. (2014), University Third mission in Italy: organization, faculty attitude and academic specialization, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 472-486.

Romagnosi S. (2016), Produzione e gestione di beni culturali nella valutazione Anvur della terza missione, Museologia Scientifica, 10, pp. 25-32.

Romagnosi S. (2016), La valutazione della Terza Missione da parte dell’Anvur, Rivista Universitas, 141, pp. 16-19.

Rossi P. (2016), Luci e ombre della Vqr, Analysis, 2: 7-11.

Sabella M., Ciolfi A. (2017), Indicatori per la Qualità dei Corsi di Studio Universitari, Education 2.0: http://www.educationduepuntozero.it/dopo-il-diploma/indicatori-per-la-qualita-dei-corsi-di-studio-universitari.shtml

Sirilli, G. (2012), Si può stimare che la VQR costerà 300 Milioni di Euro. E a pagarli sarà l’università, Roars, Return On Academic Research:   http://www.roars.it/online/si-puo-stimare-che-la-vqr-costera-300-milioni-di-euro-e-a-pagarli-sara-luniversita/.

Stame N. (2016), Valutazione pluralista, FrancoAngeli, Milano.

Traag V., Cicero T., Malgarini M., Sarlo S., Waltman L. (2018), Peer review uncertainty at the institutional level, 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology indicators, Leiden, pp. 990-98.: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/65241/STI2018_paper_166.pdf?sequence=1

Traag, V. A., Malgarini, M., Sarlo, S. (2020), Metrics and peer review agreement at the institutional level, arXiv:2006.14830v1. 

Turri M. (2012), Linee di evoluzione della valutazione nei sistemi universitari europei, Liuc Papers 259, Serie Economia e Impresa, 67: 1-15.

Valente, M., Pini, P., Moneta, A. (2015), I vizi nella valutazione della ricerca scientifica, Economia e Politica, 7, 9, 1. https://www.economiaepolitica.it/lavoro-e-diritti/diritti/universita-e-ricerca/i-vizi-nella-valutazione-della-ricerca-scientifica/

Valentini E. (2013), Ritorno al passato? Il cortocircuito riforme/valutazione nel campo delle scienze umanistiche e politiche-sociali, Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, 100: 72-90.

Vieira, E. S., Gomes, J. A. (2016), The bibliometric indicators as predictors of the final decision of the peer review, Research Evaluation, 25(2), 170-183.

Viesti, G. (2017), A proposito dei dipartimenti di “eccellenza” e di quelli “disabili”, Roars, Return On Academic Research: https://www.roars.it/online/a-proposito-dei-dipartimenti-di-eccellenza-e-di-quelli-disabili/

Viola, M. (2017), Evaluation of research(ers) and its threat to epistemic pluralisms, European Journal of Analytical Philosophy, 13(2): 55–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.4

Zanazzi, S. (2014), Evaluating and financing university research: A Comparative Case Study: Italy, France, Spain and Germany (Vol. 6), Edizioni Nuova Cultura.